AIR QUALITY LIFE INDEX
®
| UPDATE FEBRUARY 2019
Pakistan’s Air Pollution
Challenge & Potential for
Longer Lives
By Michael Greenstone and Qing (Claire) Fan
Index
®
2 | Pakistan’s Air Pollution Challenge & Potential for Longer Lives AQLI
SUMMARY
Pakistan had the fth most polluted air in the world in 2016, due mostly to
vehicular and industrial emissions and crop burning. If sustained, this air
pollution would cut 2.7 years o the lives of the typical Pakistani, relative to
what their life expectancy would be if the World Health Organization (WHO)
guideline was met; and 2.2 years relative to its own air quality standard.
The district of Lahore suers the worst, with the average residents losing 5.3
years o their lives, relative to the WHO guideline. As the government begins
to confront the air quality problem, this analysis shows that Pakistan has
the opportunity to vastly clean up its air. If the country achieved sustained
improvements in air quality comparable to what China has achieved in recent
years, its residents would live 1.2 years longer on average. Those in Lahore
would live 1.9 years longer.
Figure 1 · Countries with Worst Air Pollution – PM
2.5
Concentration in 2016 and Life Expectancy Gain
Through Permanently Reducing PM
2.5
to WHO Guideline
0
20
40
Democratic Republic
of the Congo
Tajikistan
Laos
Thailand
Republic of Congo
Pakistan
China
Bangladesh
India
Nepal
PM
2.5
Concentration (µg/m)
0
3
4
2
1
Years of Life Expectancy
AQLI Pakistan’s Air Pollution Challenge & Potential for Longer Lives | 3
INTRODUCTION
Pakistan’s Pollution
Challenge
Pakistan had the fifth most polluted air in the world in
2016, driven by the common culprits in much of South Asia:
emissions from vehicles, industrial activity such as brick kilns,
factories, and power plants, and crop burning (see Figure 1).
This level of air pollution is undermining Pakistanishealth,
cutting the average life expectancy short by 2.7 years, relative
to what it would be if the WHO guideline of 10 µg/m³ for long-
term ne particulate matter (PM
2.5
) pollution was met; and
2.2 years relative to its own air quality standard of 15 µg/m³.
In 2016, 98 percent of Pakistan’s over 200 million people lived
in areas where the annual average particulate pollution level
exceeded the WHO guideline (see Figure 2). Ninety-seven percent
of the population lived in areas where it exceeded Pakistan’s
own PM
2.5
standard. These high concentrations are the result
of a 54 percent increase in PM
2.5
concentrations since 1998.
The areas of Pakistan that fare the worst are located along its
eastern border, particularly in the province of Punjab where
the average resident lives 3.8 years less relative to if the WHO
guideline was met. The most polluted district in the province,
as well as in the country, is Lahore, which includes the country’s
second-largest city with a population of 11 million. Air quality
in Lahore has declined over the last two decades: in 1998, its
pollution concentration was 33 µg/m³. By 2016, it had doubled
to 64 µg/m³—more than six times the WHO guideline. If PM
2.5
concentrations are sustained at this level, the life expectancy
lost would be 5.3 years for the typical person, relative to what
it would be if the WHO guideline was met. In Faisalabad, the
district containing Pakistan’s third-largest city, residents lose
an average of 4.8 years, relative to the WHO guideline.
The Dawn of a New Era?
The Pakistani government has begun to respond to the air
pollution challenge. In 2017, the government of Punjab
took emergency measures to ban crop burning and enforce
emissions regulations on factories and vehicles. They also
experimented with shutting down coal-red power plants to
control short-term air pollution, although this led to power
outages.
In 2018, Prime Minister Imran Khan came into power and
told his cabinet that pollution “is a serious issue that must
be addressed.” Following a court order, his government began
to restart or install air quality monitors. Khan also shuttered
factories in 12 highly-polluted districts for two months this
winter, and has pushed brick kiln owners to shift to cleaner
technologies. Some kiln operators have been ned for using
the dirtiest technologies, as have some farmers for their crop
burning. Additionally, the government is considering setting
higher emissions standards for vehicles.
METHODOLOGY
The life expectancy calculations made by the AQLI are based on a
pair of peer-reviewed studies, Chen et al. (2013) and Ebenstein et
al. (2017), co-authored by Michael Greenstone, that exploit a unique
natural experiment in China. By comparing two subgroups of the
population that experienced prolonged exposure to different levels
of particulate air pollution, the studies were able to plausibly isolate
the effect of particulates air pollution from other factors that affect
health. The more recent of the two studies found that sustained
exposure to an additional 10 μg/m
3
of PM
10
reduces life expectancy
by 0.64 years. In terms of PM
2.5
, this translates to the relationship
that an additional 10 μg/m
3
of PM
2.5
reduces life expectancy
by 0.98 years. The AQLI applied this finding to Pakistan’s PM
2.5
concentrations, taken from satellite-derived PM
2.5
measurements,
to determine the current life expectancy impacts of air pollution
in Pakistan and the potential impacts of air pollution reduction. To
learn more about the methodology used by the AQLI, visit: aqli.epic.
uchicago.edu/about/methodology
Figure 2 · PM
2.5
Concentration in 2016
PM
2.5
(μg/m
3
)
0 to 10
10 to 15
15 to 30
30 to 40
40 to 50
50 to 60
60 to 70
Note: Pakistan’s regions and borders follow the Survey of Pakistan.
4 | Pakistan’s Air Pollution Challenge & Potential for Longer Lives AQLI
Figure 3 · Life Expectancy Gain from Achieving 32% Reduction in PM
2.5
in 10 Largest Cities and All of Pakistan
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
All Pakistan
Quetta
Karachi
Hyderabad
Peshwar
Rawalpindi
Islamabad
Multan
Gujranwala
Faisalabad
Lahore
Note: This graph includes the 10 cities with the largest populations according to Pakistan’s 2017 Census. Since the AQLI’s data for Pakistan is at the district level, the life expectancy statistics depicted
are those associated with the districts that contain the cities. For details on other districts and cities, please see the Appendix.
Figure 4 · Change in PM
2.5
from 32% PM
2.5
Reduction
PM
2.5
(μg/m
3
)
-5 to -2
-10 to -5
-15 to -10
-20 to -15
Note: Pakistan’s regions and borders follow the Survey of Pakistan.
Figure 5 · Life Expectancy Gain from Achieving 32% PM
2.5
Reduction
Gain in Life
Expectancy
(Years)
< 0.1
0.1 to 0.5
0.5 to 1.0
1.0 to 2.0
Note: Pakistan’s regions and borders follow the Survey of Pakistan.
AQLI Pakistan’s Air Pollution Challenge & Potential for Longer Lives | 5
RESULTS
Potential Impacts
Throughout history, countries all over the world have
experienced intense air pollution during periods of rapid
industrialization. At the same time, in countries where
citizens demand change and governments follow-up
with strong policies, there are successful track records of
air pollution reductions. That legacy of environmental
improvement is evidence that Pakistan’s pollution today does
not need to be tomorrow’s fate.
In fact, China has seen tremendous progress in improving air
quality in the last few years. In 2014, the government declared
a “war against pollution” and instituted a nationwide plan
to confront it. According to measurements from ground-level
monitors, particulate pollution in China’s cities has been
reduced by 32 percent on average since the war against
pollution’ was announced.
1
Though these reductions
are generally larger than the reductions found with the
satellite-derived pollution data used in the AQLI, if they are
confirmed and sustained over time, life expectancy would
improve by 2.3 years. India, having declared its own war
against pollution in January 2019, would be on a similar
path if it succeeds in meeting its stated pollution reduction
target of 20-30 percent.
Pakistan has the opportunity to experience the same
progress. If Pakistan were to achieve the same 32 percent
pollution reduction experienced in China and to sustain
it, its residents would live 1.2 years longer on average. This
would take the country 52 percent of the way to achieving
its air quality standard and 43 percent of the way toward
meeting the WHO guideline. Those in the highly-polluted
district of Lahore would live 2 years longer (see Figures 3-5).
1The monitor data generally show higher PM2.5 concentrations, and larger percent reductions, than the satellite-derived pollution data used in the AQLI.
For more information about our analysis of Chinese monitor data, see “Is China Winning its War on Pollution” at aqli.epic.uchicago.edu/reports
CONCLUSION
According to the AQLI, PM
2.5
air pollution is shortening the
average person’s life expectancy by about 1.8 years globally.
Pakistan had the fth highest amount of particulate pollution
in the world in 2016. As a result, the typical Pakistani is losing
2.7 years due to this pollution. In some places, like Lahore, the
loss is as much as 5.3 years.
In the last several decades other countries, including Japan, the
United States, and the United Kingdom, have enacted and suc-
cessfully enforced policies to reduce air pollution, underscoring
that today’s air pollution need not be tomorrow’s fate. And
more recently, China has greatly reduced PM
2.5
concentrations
after “declaring a war on pollution.” The AQLI makes concrete
that the benets of these policies can be measured in perhaps
the most important metric — longer and healthier lives (see
Appendix).
Note: The AQLI follows the Survey of Pakistan’s delineation of Pakistan’s national borders and the disputed territory of Jammu and
Kashmir. The country-level statistics in this report were aggregated excluding the region marked as disputed in this map.
“If Pakistan’s government is
successful in following through
on their recent plans to reduce air
pollution, the reward will be longer
and healthier lives for Pakistanis.
Michael Greenstone, Milton Friedman
Distinguished Service Professor in Economics,
the College and the Harris School; Director, EPIC
6 | Pakistan’s Air Pollution Challenge & Potential for Longer Lives AQLI
Appendix Table I Current and Potential PM
2.5
and Life Expectancy Impact in 50 Most
Populous Districts
To WHO
Guideline of
10 µg/m
3
To National
Standard of
15 µg/m
3
By 32%
2
Province District
Population
(Millions)
1
2016
After 32%
Reduction
All Pakistan 203.2 37 25 2.7 2.2 1.2
Sindh Karachi City 22.4 16 11 0.5 0.1 0.5
Punjab Lahore 9.4 64 43 5.3 4.8 2.0
Punjab Faisalabad 8.1 59 40 4.8 4.3 1.8
Punjab Gujranwala 5.1 58 40 4.7 4.3 1.8
Punjab Rawalpindi 4.9 41 28 3.0 2.5 1.3
Punjab Rahim Yar Khan 4.7 28 19 1.8 1.3 0.9
Punjab Multan 4.6 42 28 3.1 2.6 1.3
Punjab Sialkot 4.0 57 39 4.6 4.2 1.8
Punjab Sargodha 4.0 49 34 3.9 3.4 1.5
Punjab Muzaffargarh 3.9 38 26 2.8 2.3 1.2
Punjab Bahawalpur 3.6 34 23 2.4 1.9 1.1
Punjab Kasur 3.5 61 41 5.0 4.5 1.9
Punjab Okara 3.3 59 40 4.8 4.3 1.8
Punjab Vehari 3.1 44 30 3.3 2.8 1.4
Punjab Khanewal 3.1 46 31 3.5 3.1 1.5
Punjab Gujrat 3.1 52 35 4.1 3.6 1.6
Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa
Peshawar 3.1 34 23 2.3 1.9 1.1
Punjab Bahawalnagar 3.0 42 29 3.1 2.7 1.3
Punjab Sheikhupura 3.0 61 42 5.0 4.6 1.9
Punjab Jhang 2.8 48 33 3.7 3.2 1.5
Punjab Sahiwal 2.7 55 38 4.4 3.9 1.7
Punjab Dera Ghazi Khan 2.4 34 23 2.3 1.9 1.1
Punjab Toba Tek Singh 2.4 50 34 3.9 3.4 1.6
Sindh Khairpur 2.2 26 18 1.6 1.1 0.8
1 Population statistics were aggregated from LandScan (2015) gridded population data. The all-Pakistan
population was aggregated using the national borders depicted by the Survey of Pakistan.
2 As China achieved from 20132017. For more information, see Is China Winning its War on Pollution?
PM
2.5
Concentration (µg/m
3
)
Life Expectancy Gain (Years) from Reducing
PM
2.5
from 2016 Concentration
AQLI Pakistan’s Air Pollution Challenge & Potential for Longer Lives | 7
Appendix Table I Current and Potential PM
2.5
and Life Expectancy Impact in 50 Most
Populous Districts
To WHO
Guideline of
10 µg/m
3
To National
Standard of
15 µg/m
3
By 32%
2
Province District
Population
(Millions)
1
2016
After 32%
Reduction
Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa
Mardan 2.2 35 24 2.5 2.0 1.1
Sindh Hyderabad 2.2 19 13 0.9 0.4 0.6
Sindh Sanghar 2.1 20 14 1.0 0.5 0.6
Punjab Attock 1.9 37 25 2.6 2.1 1.2
Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa
Swat 1.9 25 17 1.5 1.0 0.8
Punjab Pakpattan 1.9 54 37 4.3 3.8 1.7
Punjab Narowal 1.9 61 42 5.0 4.5 1.9
Punjab Nankana Sahib 1.9 60 41 4.9 4.4 1.9
Punjab Lodhran 1.7 41 28 3.0 2.5 1.3
Punjab Mandi Bahauddin 1.7 51 35 4.0 3.5 1.6
Punjab Layyah 1.7 41 28 3.0 2.5 1.3
Punjab Rajanpur 1.7 31 21 2.0 1.6 1.0
Sindh Badin 1.6 18 12 0.8 0.3 0.6
Punjab Chakwal 1.6 39 27 2.8 2.3 1.2
Sindh Dadu 1.6 22 15 1.2 0.7 0.7
Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa
Swabi 1.6 36 25 2.6 2.1 1.1
Sindh Naushahro Feroze 1.6 24 16 1.4 0.9 0.8
Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa
Charsadda 1.6 34 23 2.3 1.9 1.1
Punjab Mianwali 1.6 41 28 3.0 2.5 1.3
Punjab Bhakkar 1.6 42 29 3.2 2.7 1.3
Sindh
Shaheed
Benazirabad
1.6 22 15 1.1 0.6 0.7
Islamabad
Capital Territory
Islamabad 1.5 41 28 3.1 2.6 1.3
Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa
Mansehra 1.5 30 20 1.9 1.5 0.9
Sindh Larkana 1.5 27 18 1.7 1.2 0.9
Punjab Chiniot 1.4 55 37 4.4 3.9 1.7
Sindh Ghotki 1.4 26 18 1.6 1.1 0.8
PM
2.5
Concentration (µg/m
3
)
Life Expectancy Gain (Years) from Reducing
PM
2.5
from 2016 Concentration
ABOUT THE AIR QUALITY LIFE INDEX
®
The AQLI is a pollution index that translates particulate air pollution into perhaps the most important
metric that exists: its impact on life expectancy. Developed by the University of Chicago’s Milton
Friedman Professor in Economics Michael Greenstone and his team at the Energy Policy Institute
at the University of Chicago (EPIC), the AQLI is rooted in recent research that quanties the causal
relationship between long-term human exposure to air pollution and life expectancy. The Index then
combines this research with hyper-localized, global particulate measurements, yielding unprecedented
insight into the true cost of particulate pollution in communities around the world. The Index also
illustrates how air pollution policies can increase life expectancy when they meet the World Health
Organization’s guideline for what is considered a safe level of exposure, existing national air quality
standards, or user-dened air quality levels. This information can help to inform local communities
and policymakers about the importance of air pollution policies in concrete terms.
ABOUT EPIC
The Energy Policy Institute at the University of Chicago (EPIC) is confronting the global energy challenge
by working to ensure that energy markets provide access to reliable, aordable energy, while limiting
environmental and social damages. We do this using a unique interdisciplinary approach that translates
robust, data-driven research into real-world impacts through strategic outreach and training for the
next generation of global energy leaders.
FURTHER READING
Introducing the Air Quality Life Index: Twelve Facts about Particulate Air Pollution, Human Health,
and Global Policy
Is China Winning its War on Pollution?
India’s War Against Pollution’: An Opportunity for Longer Lives
aqli.epic.uchicago.edu/reports
aqli.epic.uchicago.edu @UChiEnergy #AQLI
/UChicagoEnergy
epic.uchicago.edu @UChiEnergy