CHAPTER FOUR Climate Change Mitigation: Technology and Operations 121
Advancing Technology Opportunities To Further Reduce CO2 Emissions
FIGURE 10: Wing span-load alleviation system to reduce root
bending moment (schematic)
Finally, alternate aircraft architecture concepts (e.g.,
blended wing or truss-braced wing) may enable further
structural opportunities, allowing larger wing spans and
advanced material technologies for additional fuel-burn
reduction. Maturation of aircraft configurations that
are dramatically different from currently operational
architectures will require significant development and
demonstration to ensure that the same level of safety
and integrated optimization is achieved.
SUMMARY
Several new as well as derivative airplanes with significant
further reduction in fuel-burn are entering the global
aviation system today - and are expected to continue
to do so in the coming years. Airframe and engine
manufacturers are working with governmental, regulatory
and academic research agencies to continue progress
and maturation of promising technologies in the areas
of aerodynamics, propulsion and structural designs that
can be safely, economically, and practically integrated
in existing and new highly optimized aircraft. Further
advances in computational simulation within each
discipline and at the integrated aircraft level can enhance
multi-disciplinary optimization of advanced technologies,
while satisfying manufacturing requirements.
Continued research and development programs are key
to progress technology and aircraft integration concepts
from laboratory and computational research stages to full-
scale demonstration and validation towards operational
and certification readiness. Manufacturing, operational
and economic considerations need to be considered in
technology maturation assessment.
Opportunities in aerodynamic drag reduction, propulsive
technology, manufacturing, structural design, as well
as in aircraft configuration integration are expected
to result in continued reductions in aircraft emissions.
Due to integration complexity, some of the mentioned
technologies may require incorporation in a new airplane
(versus retrofitting existing aircraft), or a new aircraft
configuration architecture altogether.
This article was written in collaboration by the following
ICCAIA members: Jean-Pierre Cabanac, Gerd Heller and
Rudiger Thomas (all Airbus); Krisha Nobrega (Embraer);
Simon Smith (Rolls-Royce); Andrew Murphy (Pratt &
Whitney); Olivier Penanhoat (Safran); Greg Steinmetz
(GE); and Daniel Allyn and Paul Vijgen (all Boeing).
REFERENCES
Document 9963 (2010). Report of the Independent Experts
on the Medium and Long Term Goals for Aviation Fuel Burn
Reduction from Technology, Montreal.
http://www.cleansky.eu/
https://www.airbus.com/newsroom/press-releases/en/2017/09/
airbus_-_blade_-laminar-flow-wing-demonstrator-makes-first-
fligh.html
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20140012638
https://www.faa.gov/about/oce_org/head quarters_oces/
apl/research/aircraft_ technology/cleen/
http://www.cleansky.eu/engines
https://www.newmaterials.com/News_Detail_Jec
_composites_exhibition__carbon_fibre_prepreg_content_on_
each_a350_xwb_is_worth_over_4_million_to_hexcel_12957.asp
http://additivemanufacturing.com/2016/01/27/airbus-group-
pioneering-bionic-3d-printing-learning-from-nature/
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/armstrong/features/pat_wing.
html
https://www.nasa.gov/centers/armstrong/features/highly_
flexible_wings_tested.html